Effect of intervertebral translational flexibilities on estimations of trunk muscle forces, kinematics, loads, and stability
Farshid Ghezelbash,
Navid Arjmand and
Aboulfazl Shirazi-Adl
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 2015, vol. 18, issue 16, 1760-1767
Abstract:
Due to the complexity of the human spinal motion segments, the intervertebral joints are often simulated in the musculoskeletal trunk models as pivots thus allowing no translational degrees of freedom (DOFs). This work aims to investigate, for the first time, the effect of such widely used assumption on trunk muscle forces, spinal loads, kinematics, and stability during a number of static activities. To address this, the shear deformable beam elements used in our nonlinear finite element (OFE) musculoskeletal model of the trunk were either substantially stiffened in translational directions (SFE model) or replaced by hinge joints interconnected through rotational springs (HFE model). Results indicated that ignoring intervertebral translational DOFs had in general low to moderate impact on model predictions. Compared with the OFE model, the SFE and HFE models predicted generally larger L4–L5 and L5–S1 compression and shear loads, especially for tasks with greater trunk angles; differences reached ∼15% for the L4–L5 compression, ∼36% for the L4–L5 shear and ∼18% for the L5–S1 shear loads. Such differences increased, as location of the hinge joints in the HFE model moved from the mid-disc height to either the lower or upper endplates. Stability analyses of these models for some select activities revealed small changes in predicted margin of stability. Model studies dealing exclusively with the estimation of spinal loads and/or stability may, hence with small loss of accuracy, neglect intervertebral translational DOFs at smaller trunk flexion angles for the sake of computational simplicity.
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2014.961440 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:18:y:2015:i:16:p:1760-1767
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/gcmb20
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2014.961440
Access Statistics for this article
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering is currently edited by Director of Biomaterials John Middleton
More articles in Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().