Predictive mathematical modeling of knee static laxity after ACL reconstruction: in vivo analysis

C. Signorelli, T. Bonanzinga, A. Grassi, N. Lopomo, S. Zaffagnini and M. Marcacci

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 2016, vol. 19, issue 15, 1610-1617

Abstract: Previous studies did not take into consideration such large variety of surgery variables which describe the performed anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and the interaction among them in the definition of postoperative outcome. Seventeen patients who underwent navigated Single Bundle plus Lateral Plasty ACL reconstruction were enrolled in the study. Static laxity was evaluated as the value of anterior/posterior displacement at 30° and at 90° of flexion, internal/external rotation at 30° and 90° of knee flexion, varus/valgus test at 0° and 30° of flexion. The evaluated surgical variables were analyzed through a multivariate analysis defining the following models: AP30estimate, AP90estimate, IE30estimate, IE90estimate, VV0estimate, VV30estimate. Surgical variables has been defined as the angles between the tibial tunnel and the three planes, the lengths of the tunnel and the relationship between native footprints and tunnels. An analogous characterization was performed for the femoral side. Performance and significance of the defined models have been quantified by the correlation ratio (η2) and the corresponding p-value (*p < 0.050). The analyzed models resulted to be statistically significant (p < 0.05) for prediction of postoperative static laxity values. The only exception was the AP90estimate model. The η2 ranged from 0.568 (IE90estimate) to 0.995 (IE30estimate). The orientation of the tibial tunnel resulted to be the most important surgical variable for the performed laxity estimation. Mathematical models for postoperative knee laxity is a useful tool to evaluate the effects of different surgical variables on the postoperative outcome.

Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2016.1176152 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:19:y:2016:i:15:p:1610-1617

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/gcmb20

DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2016.1176152

Access Statistics for this article

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering is currently edited by Director of Biomaterials John Middleton

More articles in Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().