Flow analysis of aortic dissection: comparison of inflow boundary conditions for computational models based on 4D PCMRI and Doppler ultrasound
Zhenfeng Li,
Shichao Liang,
Huanming Xu,
Minjia Zhu,
Yuqian Mei,
Jiang Xiong and
Duanduan Chen
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 2021, vol. 24, issue 11, 1251-1262
Abstract:
Computational hemodynamics quantifying the flow environment is an important tool in understanding aortic dissection. In this study, various inflow boundaries were applied on a patient-specific model and compared to the individualized velocimetry. The results indicated that the computations generally overestimated the flow volume and underestimated the wall shear stress. By quantifying the accuracy of the simulation results, two inflow settings were suggested. One was individualized, the PCMRI-extracted 4D flow information, and the other was averaged by healthy data, the ultrasound-extracted averaged flow waveform with parabolic velocity profile. This study might contribute to improving the precise computation of aortic dissection hemodynamics.
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2021.1876036 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:24:y:2021:i:11:p:1251-1262
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/gcmb20
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2021.1876036
Access Statistics for this article
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering is currently edited by Director of Biomaterials John Middleton
More articles in Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().