EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Joint L2,p-norm and random walk graph constrained PCA for single-cell RNA-seq data

Tai-Ge Wang, Jun-Liang Shang, Jin-Xing Liu, Feng Li, Shasha Yuan and Juan Wang

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 2024, vol. 27, issue 4, 498-511

Abstract: The development and widespread utilization of high-throughput sequencing technologies in biology has fueled the rapid growth of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data over the past decade. The development of scRNA-seq technology has significantly expanded researchers’ understanding of cellular heterogeneity. Accurate cell type identification is the prerequisite for any research on heterogeneous cell populations. However, due to the high noise and high dimensionality of scRNA-seq data, improving the effectiveness of cell type identification remains a challenge. As an effective dimensionality reduction method, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is an essential tool for visualizing high-dimensional scRNA-seq data and identifying cell subpopulations. However, traditional PCA has some defects when used in mining the nonlinear manifold structure of the data and usually suffers from over-density of principal components (PCs). Therefore, we present a novel method in this paper called joint L2,p-norm and random walk graph constrained PCA (RWPPCA). RWPPCA aims to retain the data’s local information in the process of mapping high-dimensional data to low-dimensional space, to more accurately obtain sparse principal components and to then identify cell types more precisely. Specifically, RWPPCA combines the random walk (RW) algorithm with graph regularization to more accurately determine the local geometric relationships between data points. Moreover, to mitigate the adverse effects of dense PCs, the L2,p-norm is introduced to make the PCs sparser, thus increasing their interpretability. Then, we evaluate the effectiveness of RWPPCA on simulated data and scRNA-seq data. The results show that RWPPCA performs well in cell type identification and outperforms other comparison methods.

Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2023.2188106 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:27:y:2024:i:4:p:498-511

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/gcmb20

DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2023.2188106

Access Statistics for this article

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering is currently edited by Director of Biomaterials John Middleton

More articles in Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:27:y:2024:i:4:p:498-511