Is monopsony the right way to model labor markets? a review of Alan Manning's monopsony in motion
Peter Kuhn ()
International Journal of the Economics of Business, 2004, vol. 11, issue 3, 369-378
Manning proposes that the 'traditional' monopsony model, once regarded as an analytical curiosity, be adopted as a widely-applicable description of firms' behavior in labor markets. In Manning's view, search frictions in the labor market generate upward-sloping labor supply curves to individual firms even when firms are small relative to the labor market. Thus a model of 'monopsonistic competition' best characterizes labor markets as a whole. Manning's book applies this new perspective to a wide range of 'traditional' topics in labor economics, ranging from labor supply, to gender discrimination, to the effects of trade unions on wages and employment, generating refreshing new insights in each case. Ultimately, however, this reader was left unconvinced that monopsony is the 'right' model of most firms' labor market behavior in the long run.
Keywords: Monopsony; Search; Labor Markets; Wages; Employment; JEL Classification: J00; J42; J63 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:ijecbs:v:11:y:2004:i:3:p:369-378
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
International Journal of the Economics of Business is currently edited by Eleanor Morgan
More articles in International Journal of the Economics of Business from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().