EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Robustness of interval estimation of the 90% effective dose: Bootstrap resampling and some large-sample parametric methods

Yangxin Huang

Journal of Applied Statistics, 2002, vol. 29, issue 7, 1071-1081

Abstract: Interval estimation of the x th effective dose (ED x ), where x is a prespecified percentage, has been the focus of interest of a number of recent studies, the majority of which have considered the case in which a logistic dose-response curve is correctly assumed. In this paper, we focus our attention upon the 90% effective dose (ED 90 ) and consider the situation in which the assumption of a logistic dose-response curve is incorrect. Specifically, we consider three classes of true model: the probit, the cubic logistic and the asymmetric Aranda-Ordaz models. We investigate the robustness of four large sample parametric methods of interval construction and four methods based upon bootstrap resampling.

Date: 2002
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0266476022000006748 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:japsta:v:29:y:2002:i:7:p:1071-1081

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/CJAS20

DOI: 10.1080/0266476022000006748

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Applied Statistics is currently edited by Robert Aykroyd

More articles in Journal of Applied Statistics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:29:y:2002:i:7:p:1071-1081