Assessing contrasting strategies for ensuring ethical practice within evaluation: institutional review boards and professionalisation
Peter O’Flynn,
Chris Barnett and
Laura Camfield
Journal of Development Effectiveness, 2016, vol. 8, issue 4, 561-568
Abstract:
This paper explores the application of ethics in two contrasting approaches to evaluation: one that views evaluation as essentially a research project, and the other that sees evaluation as an extension of project management. We argue that the growth in so-called rigorous impact evaluation, characterised by practitioners as evaluation using experimental or quasi-experimental methods, has seen evaluation treated increasingly as a subset of research. This has entailed greater use of ethical committees, and specifically institutional review boards (IRBs), as many academics promoting the use of experimental methods are based in the USA. Elsewhere, evaluation is treated more as a management activity, with professionalisation initiatives such as membership standards and ethical guidance often used in the place of formal review. In this paper, we question whether the simultaneous growth in usage of IRBs and professionalisation addresses the ethical issues faced by evaluators.
Date: 2016
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19439342.2016.1242643 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:8:y:2016:i:4:p:561-568
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RJDE20
DOI: 10.1080/19439342.2016.1242643
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Development Effectiveness is currently edited by Howard White
More articles in Journal of Development Effectiveness from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().