Are structural equation models theories and does it matter?

David Trafimow, Michael R. Hyman and Alena Kostyk

Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 2023, vol. 33, issue 2, 248-263

Abstract: In their introductory marketing, management, and social psychology courses, undergraduates learn that correlation coefficients provide weak evidence for causal conclusions. Nonetheless, researchers conclude causally from correlation coefficients by drawing causal arrows in their structural equation models (SEMs). Although most researchers avoid describing their findings in causal language, obligatory recommendations for applying those findings insert causation. Researchers’ standard rejoinder to validity challenges is “the critics have ignored theory’s role in rendering our SEM internally and externally valid”. To evaluate this rejoinder, we explore SEMs based on comprehensive underlying theories and as stand-alone and testable context-specific theories that blend previously published hypotheses and findings. In most cases, the rejoinder is unconvincing.

Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21639159.2022.2048960 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jgsmks:v:33:y:2023:i:2:p:248-263

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RGAM20

DOI: 10.1080/21639159.2022.2048960

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science is currently edited by Seong-Yeon Park

More articles in Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().