Did Population Well-being Improve During Porfirian Mexico? A Regional Analysis using a Quasi-Human Development Index
Raymundo Campos-Vazquez and
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Roberto Velez Grajales
Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 2012, vol. 13, issue 4, 597-620
It is argued that economic growth during the Porfiriato did not improve the well-being of the Mexican population. One explanation for such result is that the economic growth pattern was skewed and benefited more the northern states and less the southern ones. Following the estimation method of the Human Development Index, we calculate a Quasi-Human Development Index for the Mexican states during the period 1895--1910. Results show that at the start of the period (1895) the northern states were already the most developed. During the next 15 years this pattern was maintained and the dispersion in human development increased marginally. Finally, it is shown that the true losers of the Porfiriato were the states surrounding Mexico City and not the southern ones.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jhudca:v:13:y:2012:i:4:p:597-620
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Human Development and Capabilities is currently edited by Kathryn Rosenblum
More articles in Journal of Human Development and Capabilities from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().