Exact Meta-Analysis Approach for Discrete Data and its Application to 2 × 2 Tables With Rare Events
Dungang Liu,
Regina Y. Liu and
Min-ge Xie
Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2014, vol. 109, issue 508, 1450-1465
Abstract:
This article proposes a general exact meta-analysis approach for synthesizing inferences from multiple studies of discrete data. The approach combines the p-value functions (also known as significance functions ) associated with the exact tests from individual studies. It encompasses a broad class of exact meta-analysis methods, as it permits broad choices for the combining elements, such as tests used in individual studies, and any parameter of interest. The approach yields statements that explicitly account for the impact of individual studies on the overall inference, in terms of efficiency/power and the Type I error rate. Those statements also give rises to empirical methods for further enhancing the combined inference. Although the proposed approach is for general discrete settings, for convenience, it is illustrated throughout using the setting of meta-analysis of multiple 2 × 2 tables. In the context of rare events data, such as observing few, zero, or zero total (i.e., zero events in both arms) outcomes in binomial trials or 2 × 2 tables, most existing meta-analysis methods rely on the large-sample approximations which may yield invalid inference. The commonly used corrections to zero outcomes in rare events data, aiming to improve numerical performance can also incur undesirable consequences. The proposed approach applies readily to any rare event setting, including even the zero total event studies without any artificial correction. While debates continue on whether or how zero total event studies should be incorporated in meta-analysis, the proposed approach has the advantage of automatically including those studies and thus making use of all available data. Through numerical studies in rare events settings, the proposed exact approach is shown to be efficient and, generally, outperform commonly used meta-analysis methods, including Mantel-Haenszel and Peto methods.
Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01621459.2014.946318 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:109:y:2014:i:508:p:1450-1465
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/UASA20
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2014.946318
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of the American Statistical Association is currently edited by Xuming He, Jun Liu, Joseph Ibrahim and Alyson Wilson
More articles in Journal of the American Statistical Association from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().