Coastal Vulnerability as Discourse About Meanings and Values

Colin Green and Loraine McFadden

Journal of Risk Research, 2007, vol. 10, issue 8, 1027-1045

Abstract: This paper argues that any approach to defining vulnerability is a social act, and is expressive of and grounded in some assumptions about the nature and purpose of language. Managing a complex environment such as the coastal zone is necessarily about choice and conflicts. A purpose of language is to persuade others to adopt the course of action that the individual or group consider should be adopted. In consequence, the definitions of vulnerability will necessarily be multiple and contested. From the research perspective what is then of interest are those insights into the nature of the choice, and particularly as to appropriate course of action to adopt, that are generated by any specific elaboration of vulnerability. It is thus less what people say than why they say it that is of importance in understanding their definitions of vulnerability and the intentions that underlie their discourse.

Date: 2007
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669870701566557 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:10:y:2007:i:8:p:1027-1045

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RJRR20

DOI: 10.1080/13669870701566557

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Risk Research is currently edited by Bryan MacGregor

More articles in Journal of Risk Research from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().