Dealing with future risks in the Netherlands: the National Security Strategy and the National Risk Assessment

M.G. Mennen and M.C. van Tuyll

Journal of Risk Research, 2015, vol. 18, issue 7, 860-876

Abstract: Threats to our safety and security are continuously changing and are becoming increasingly intertwined. Relatively minor threats can, through interdependencies, lead to societal disruption. In order to classify potential future risks, threats, and hazards and enhance adequate preparation and capacity building, the Dutch government approved a National Security Strategy. This all-hazard strategy includes both natural hazards and hazards caused by technical failure and malicious threats. Using this Strategy, the government is able to continually improve its overview of risks and to determine priorities regarding the allocation of resources for the prevention of, preparation for, and response to disasters. Analysis is performed using a methodology called the National Risk Assessment (NRA). In this methodology, future threats and hazards are described in scenarios, which are assessed in terms of likelihood and impact using a uniform scoring method and are therefore rendered comparable. The impact criteria reflect the five vital interests of the Netherlands: territorial security, physical safety (public health), economic security, ecological security, and social and political stability. The NRA is produced by an expert network consisting of research institutes, universities, civil services, public service corporations, and consultancy firms. On the basis of the NRA, a capabilities analysis is performed. This analysis assesses whether the country (government, private sector, and civilians) has sufficient capabilities (people, material, knowledge, skills, procedures) at its disposal to adequately deal with the threat, and considers which capabilities should be strengthened or developed. For example, the risk assessment of the occurrence of a pandemic flu showed that it could have crippling effects for the continuous functioning of critical infrastructure processes. As a response, Government and critical infrastructure companies developed business continuity plans for pandemic situations.

Date: 2015
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2014.923028 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:18:y:2015:i:7:p:860-876

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RJRR20

DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2014.923028

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Risk Research is currently edited by Bryan MacGregor

More articles in Journal of Risk Research from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().