Consistent risk regulation? Differences in the European regulation of food crops
Karin Edvardsson Björnberg,
Charlotta Zetterberg,
Sven Ove Hansson,
Erik Andreasson and
Li-Hua Zhu
Journal of Risk Research, 2019, vol. 22, issue 12, 1561-1570
Abstract:
In the EU legal system, there is a large difference between the procedures and requirements for the introduction of crops that are classified as genetically modified (GM) and crops not so classified. In order to investigate whether this regulatory divide is compatible with real risks two cases of GM crops and two cases of non-GM crops are scrutinized. It is concluded that the regulatory divide cannot be justified from the viewpoint of risk assessment, since the GM/non-GM dichotomy is not an accurate indicator of either health risk or environmental risk. Much better such indicators are available and should form the basis of a legislation aimed at preventing the introduction of crops that are harmful for human health or the environment. If the legislator has other reasons to regulate GM crops differently than conventional crops, then those reasons should be stated in the legislation and determine the types of measures that it prescribes.
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2018.1501594 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:22:y:2019:i:12:p:1561-1570
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RJRR20
DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2018.1501594
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Risk Research is currently edited by Bryan MacGregor
More articles in Journal of Risk Research from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().