Displaying expected values in risk elicitation tasks: the effect of information in experimental risk research
Daniel Hermann and
Oliver Musshoff
Journal of Risk Research, 2019, vol. 22, issue 2, 232-242
Abstract:
We investigate the influence of providing expected lottery results to experiment participants in two common risk attitude elicitation tasks. In a between-subject design, either the Holt and Laury task or the Eckel and Grossman task is carried out by a sample of 208 students. We find no significant effect of shown expected values on the risk attitude measured by the tasks. This result even holds true if we divide the experiment participants into specific sub-groups, i.e. female and male, or lower numeracy and higher numeracy participants. Furthermore, comprehension and processing time are not significantly influenced by presented expected values. Therefore, we conclude that providing information on expected values does not influence decision-making in tasks involving risk. This result indicates the robustness of elicited risk attitudes to variation in common experimental methods, and demonstrates that more information could be provided without creating bias in the results.
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2017.1378246 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:22:y:2019:i:2:p:232-242
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RJRR20
DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2017.1378246
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Risk Research is currently edited by Bryan MacGregor
More articles in Journal of Risk Research from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().