Responding Public Demand for Assurance of Genetically Modified Crops: Case from Japan
Mariko Nishizawa and
Ortwin Renn
Journal of Risk Research, 2006, vol. 9, issue 1, 41-56
Abstract:
Genetically modified (GM) crops provide a classic example of risk characterised with uncertainty and ambiguity. This article analyses the risk management of GM crops in Japan as a case and investigates how the Japanese government has responded to the growing public demand for safety assurance of new agricultural and food varieties. It argues that, while the government realised the need to respond to public reluctance in consuming GM food by adopting more resilient and discursive management, it has faced a dilemma to incorporate the new type of approach into conventional risk assessment. This tension was reflected in the process and policy outputs of the consensus conference on GM crops, which was ambiguously placed in the risk management process. This article shows the dynamics of opting for policies to manage scientifically uncertain risks in particular socio-political and institutional contexts. Such understanding can suggest ways towards enhanced policy debates.
Date: 2006
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669870500166815 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:9:y:2006:i:1:p:41-56
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RJRR20
DOI: 10.1080/13669870500166815
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Risk Research is currently edited by Bryan MacGregor
More articles in Journal of Risk Research from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().