Promising Performance: The Overestimation and Underestimation of Performance Targets
Jessica N. Terman
International Journal of Public Administration, 2019, vol. 42, issue 2, 93-107
Abstract:
This study examines goal setting in the federally funded, state-implemented Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP). Specifically, using federally determined criteria that states are supposed to use to set expected performance targets, I model the predicted performance targets and compare them against the observed performance targets. The purpose is to examine the determinants of performance target overestimation and underestimation in the WAP. The findings suggest that, where credible commitment to achieving performance targets is important (i.e., when grantees want to show top performance to attract grant money and federal partners), grantee governments are more likely to underestimate goals. However, where the aspirational nature of performance targets is more important than the credible commitment of achieving them (i.e., in an election year or partisan congruence with federal government), grantee governments are more likely to overestimate goals.
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01900692.2017.1405442 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:42:y:2019:i:2:p:93-107
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/lpad20
DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2017.1405442
Access Statistics for this article
International Journal of Public Administration is currently edited by Ali Farazmand
More articles in International Journal of Public Administration from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().