Privacy Regimes, Crisis Strategies, and Governments’ Legitimizing of Digital Surveillance Technology: Comparing Germany, Norway, and the United Kingdom

Jonas Lund-Tønnesen

International Journal of Public Administration, 2025, vol. 48, issue 5-6, 381-394

Abstract: The future trajectory of government surveillance is unmistakable: it is increasing. Yet, despite an increase in implemented surveillance measures, there is still a lack of understanding about the ways in which governments legitimize new surveillance measures and why that might vary across countries. This paper argues that ways of legitimizing digital surveillance technology are shaped by privacy regime legacies and overarching strategies of problem-solving when facing a crisis. With a cross-country comparison, the study finds both similar and different legitimacy strategies by governments in Germany, Norway, and the United Kingdom. The analysis demonstrates the significance of historical privacy practices and governmental problem-solving capacities in shaping technological change and future directions for public administration.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01900692.2024.2344105 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:lpadxx:v:48:y:2025:i:5-6:p:381-394

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/lpad20

DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2024.2344105

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Public Administration is currently edited by Ali Farazmand

More articles in International Journal of Public Administration from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().