EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A Discourse Analysis of Australian Local Government Recreation and Sport Plans Provision For People with Disabilities

Richard McGrath

Public Management Review, 2009, vol. 11, issue 4, 477-497

Abstract: Public sector reforms in Australia have been promoted as ensuring efficiencies and accountability. As a response to these reform requirements, Australian local governments publically provide documented plans regarding service provision. While these documented plans may generally be perceived as value-neutral, they have the potential to imbed particular ideologies as well as ensure certain viewpoints remain entrenched in the current social realm. Using a critical discourse analysis method, this article analysed thirty-one local government sport and recreation plans publicly to assist in identifying and highlighting imbedded values and ideologies regarding community provision for people with disabilities. Results from the analysis indicate that overwhelmingly local government authorities' focus on ensuring the suitability of the built environment. As such, physical access as the problem identifies people with disabilities as a homogonous group who are immobile and as such disenfranchises many other impaired groups. This article also questions the representativeness of people with disabilities in the community consultation process.

Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719030902989540 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:11:y:2009:i:4:p:477-497

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RPXM20

DOI: 10.1080/14719030902989540

Access Statistics for this article

Public Management Review is currently edited by Professor Stephen P. Osborne, Jenny Harrow and Tobias Jung

More articles in Public Management Review from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:11:y:2009:i:4:p:477-497