Successful Diffusion of a Failed Policy: The case of pay-for-performance in the US federal government

Seejeen Park and Frances Berry

Public Management Review, 2014, vol. 16, issue 6, 763-781

Abstract: Pay-for-performance (PFP) is a popular management approach that came out of the business sector and was adopted as a centre piece of the 1978 US Civil Service Reform Act. An extensive set of studies assess PFP as largely unsuccessful in the federal government, and many of the private sector studies also found problems in PFP in the private sector. Yet, PFP continues to be adopted by governments in Europe, the United States and Australia. Our study examines the original adoption of PFP in 1978 to assess why it diffused so readily from the private sector to the federal government. We find PFP as a good example of Kingdon's (2002) garbage can decision making in which the policy champions presented PFP as a rational policy solution to widely perceived performance appraisal and reward problems at an opportune time. The PFP was trumpeted as an innovative policy but had almost no systematic evidence of success to support its use. Indeed, the problems of private sector PFP were diffused to the public sector. This case study underscores the lack of evidence-based decision making on an important presidential human management agenda, demonstrates an example of policy adoption based on myth rather than fact and concludes that better human resource management theories built on assumptions and public service motivation pertinent to the public sector are needed.

Date: 2014
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719037.2012.750835 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:16:y:2014:i:6:p:763-781

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RPXM20

DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2012.750835

Access Statistics for this article

Public Management Review is currently edited by Professor Stephen P. Osborne, Jenny Harrow and Tobias Jung

More articles in Public Management Review from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().