From commitment to consequences

Mark Turner

Public Management Review, 2006, vol. 8, issue 2, 253-272

Abstract: Government arrangements in Southeast Asia have been typically centralized but in the 1990s the impetus of democratization pushed countries of the region into programmes of territorial decentralization. This was an entirely new experience for these countries and necessitated innovative arrangements for central -- local relations. This article examines the experience of three countries (the Philippines, Indonesia and Cambodia). The findings are that although democratization provided the initial impetus the selected architecture of decentralization in each country has been determined by domestic political actors and circumstances. There has been negligible policy transfer and early indications are that although there have been some gains in popular participation, decentralization has not led to any marked improvement in service delivery. Also, while central governments have delegated authority to subnational territories they still exert control through fiscal and other means.

Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719030600587471 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:8:y:2006:i:2:p:253-272

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RPXM20

DOI: 10.1080/14719030600587471

Access Statistics for this article

Public Management Review is currently edited by Professor Stephen P. Osborne, Jenny Harrow and Tobias Jung

More articles in Public Management Review from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().