Has the NAO Audited Risk Transfer in Operational Private Finance Initiative Schemes?

Allyson M. Pollock and David Price

Public Money & Management, 2008, vol. 28, issue 3, 173-178

Abstract: The government's main justification for using private finance is that it provides value for money by transferring project risks to the private sector. However, of the 622 PFI deals signed by October 2007, the National Audit Office (NAO) has examined the relationship between risk transfer and risk premiums in only three. The government's justification for the policy is largely unevaluated and unscrutinized by Parliament, raising wider issues of public accountability for public expenditure.

Date: 2008
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2008.00640.x (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:28:y:2008:i:3:p:173-178

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RPMM20

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9302.2008.00640.x

Access Statistics for this article

Public Money & Management is currently edited by Michaela Lavender

More articles in Public Money & Management from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().