A Response to the Claim 'There is no Problem for Transcendental Realism Here'

Stephen Parsons

Review of Political Economy, 2001, vol. 13, issue 1, 115-123

Abstract: My review of Tony Lawson's book Economics and Reality sought to clarify the nature of transcendental realism (TR) and indicate disagreements with its claims. I thank Jochen Runde for taking the time and trouble to respond to my review. Reading Runde's response made me aware that various points in my initial review were possibly not as clearly formulated as they could have been. I am thankful for the opportunity to remedy this deficiency. I would like this response to be as constructive as possible. To facilitate this, I will formulate a series of questions regarding areas where I still feel clarification of the TR position would be beneficial.

Date: 2001
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09538250150210630 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:13:y:2001:i:1:p:115-123

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/CRPE20

DOI: 10.1080/09538250150210630

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Political Economy is currently edited by Steve Pressman and Louis-Philippe Rochon

More articles in Review of Political Economy from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().