The Austrian Dehomogenization Debate, or the Possibility of a Hayekian Planner

Alejandro Agafonow

Review of Political Economy, 2012, vol. 24, issue 2, 273-287

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to explore the implications of the debate on the dehomogenization of Hayek and Mises. The Misesian thesis about the vulnerability of the Hayekian argument prevails, and that its implications have thus far not been fully appreciated. These implications consist, on the one hand, of the correct integration of the proto-Hayekian bases of economic calculation into labor time accounting socialism and, on the other, of the possibility of successfully integrating appraisement into a Hayekian market socialism through a break with the unified control of the factors of production. Our contribution will consist of providing a more comprehensive exploration of these implications.

Date: 2012
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09538259.2012.664337 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:24:y:2012:i:2:p:273-287

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/CRPE20

DOI: 10.1080/09538259.2012.664337

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Political Economy is currently edited by Steve Pressman and Louis-Philippe Rochon

More articles in Review of Political Economy from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().