 Walras or Pareto: Who is to Blame for the State of Modern Economic Theory?Review of Political Economy, 2021, vol. 33, issue 2, 280-302 Abstract: Walras and Pareto are considered founders of the Ecole de Lausanne. However, their points of view on economics as a science were at considerable variance and their appreciation of each other was limited. On the path from Adam Smith’s Invisible Hand to Arrow and Debreu’s proof of the existence of equilibrium, Walras is thought of as having formulated the general equilibrium model and Pareto as having improved upon and advanced theory and economics down the path that Walras had envisaged. The purpose of this article is to suggest that this is too simple a picture, that the road to an adequate explanation of the Invisible Hand petered out and Pareto’s contribution was instrumental in its demise. Paradoxically, the almost technical generalization of the Walrasian model that Pareto developed locked pure economic theory and modern macroeconomics, which has based itself on that theory, into a dead end. Both their different scientific visions and their antagonistic personal relationship meant that, while their interests coincided for a period, they could hardly be regarded as having a common project and thus the Ecole de Lausanne is a misnomer. Date: 2021 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:33:y:2021:i:2:p:280-302 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from DOI: 10.1080/09538259.2021.1889173 Access Statistics for this article Review of Political Economy is currently edited by Steve Pressman and Louis-Philippe Rochon More articles in Review of Political Economy from Taylor & Francis Journals |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.