J.S. Mill, W. Roscher and D.H. Robertson: The Early History of the Monetary Misperceptions Hypothesis

Mauro Boianovsky

Review of Political Economy, 2023, vol. 35, issue 4, 1003-1020

Abstract: Around 50 years ago, Edmund Phelps and Robert Lucas proposed an answer to the question of why changes in aggregate nominal spending bring about output and employment effects, instead of purely proportional variations in prices. The Phelps–Lucas monetary misperception hypothesis asserted that imperfect information about the state of the economy may cause sluggish price or wage adjustment to emerge as reactions to monetary shocks in an otherwise perfectly flexible prices economy. The present paper documents how J.S. Mill, W. Roscher and D.H. Robertson addressed that issue in their respective notions of ‘general delusion’, ‘generally prevailing error’ and ‘monetary misapprehension’, formulated between mid-19th and early 20th centuries. It also discusses how their contributions were not acknowledged until after Phelps and Lucas.

Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09538259.2022.2105015 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:35:y:2023:i:4:p:1003-1020

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/CRPE20

DOI: 10.1080/09538259.2022.2105015

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Political Economy is currently edited by Steve Pressman and Louis-Philippe Rochon

More articles in Review of Political Economy from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().