Experimental manipulation of metacognitive beliefs and paranoia in a non-clinical population

Maria Kaltsi, Sandra Bucci and Anthony P. Morrison

Psychosis, 2018, vol. 10, issue 1, 1-10

Abstract: Objective: The application of metacognitive processes in the development of paranoia has been examined, with tentative support evident. In the absence of causal conclusions, the present study examined the causal role of metacognitive beliefs in the development of paranoia by manipulating positive and negative metacognitive beliefs on paranoia frequency and distress.Method: A non-clinical sample (n = 110) was randomly assigned to either a positive or negative manipulation experimental group intended to alter beliefs about paranoia followed by a paranoia induction task (Cyberball task).Results: The positive beliefs induction was successful in manipulating metacognitive beliefs. Following the paranoia induction, the positive beliefs group reported an increase in paranoia frequency (F(1, 106) = 12.4, p = .001); the negative beliefs group reported a decrease in paranoia related distress (F(1, 104) = 8.21, p = .005).Conclusions: This is the first experimental manipulation of beliefs about paranoia study to show that positive beliefs about paranoia leads to the adoption of paranoia as a deliberate strategy for managing interpersonal threat. Findings from this novel experimental paradigm support the metacognitive prediction of the Self-Referent Executive Function model. Further investigation is needed in manipulating negative beliefs about paranoia and its impact on paranoia-related distress.

Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2017.1413128 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:1-10

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RPSY20

DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2017.1413128

Access Statistics for this article

Psychosis is currently edited by Dr John Read

More articles in Psychosis from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().