A level playing field?: Are bio-genetic and psychosocial studies evaluated by the same standards?

Richard Bentall and Filippo Varese

Psychosis, 2012, vol. 4, issue 3, 183-190

Abstract: In light of critiques of the first meta-analysis of studies examining the relationship of childhood adversities to psychosis, two of the authors of the meta-analysis ask whether the same criteria are used to evaluate bio-genetic and psycho-social research into the causes of psychosis. In light of critiques of the first meta-analysis of studies examining the relationship of childhood adversities to psychosis, two of the authors of the meta-analysis ask whether the same criteria are used to evaluate bio-genetic and psycho-social research into the causes of psychosis.

Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2012.729856 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:4:y:2012:i:3:p:183-190

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RPSY20

DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2012.729856

Access Statistics for this article

Psychosis is currently edited by Dr John Read

More articles in Psychosis from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().