Complexity, errors, and administrative burdens

Matthew M. Young, Mallory Compton, Justin B. Bullock and Robert Greer

Public Management Review, 2024, vol. 26, issue 10, 2847-2867

Abstract: Errors in administrative processes cost clientele and organizations, yet are understudied. Beyond efficiency losses, errors impose administrative burdens on clientele. Automation is a common tool for reducing errors. Little is known, however, about the factors that may augment automation’s effectiveness. We theorize that administrative errors are a function of program complexity. We expect automation to improve accuracy in less complex programs but worsen with increased complexity. With U.S. Unemployment Insurance program audit data, we use longitudinal Poisson analysis to test our expectations. Complexity is associated with greater incidences of administrative errors. As expected, automation’s effects vary with level of complexity.

Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719037.2023.2288247 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:26:y:2024:i:10:p:2847-2867

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rpxm20

DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2023.2288247

Access Statistics for this article

Public Management Review is currently edited by Stephen P. Osborne

More articles in Public Management Review from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().