Unpacking the accountability cube and its relationship with blame avoidance

Wenyan Tu

Public Management Review, 2024, vol. 26, issue 3, 701-723

Abstract: Notwithstanding the voluminous studies of accountability, little is known about its internal mechanism and its controversial relationship with blame avoidance. Based on the ‘accountability cube’ model, this study identifies four essential components of accountability: monitoring intensity, discussion quality, reward-based consequences, and punishment-based consequences. It explores the impacts of the four elements and their diverse configurations on bureaucrats’ blame avoidance. Drawing on survey data from Chinese civil servants, this study suggests that sanction-based accountability comprising stringent monitoring and punishment may trigger blame avoidance. Trust-based accountability, which includes high discussion quality and potential rewarding consequences, is more beneficial in containing blame avoidance.

Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719037.2022.2116092 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:26:y:2024:i:3:p:701-723

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rpxm20

DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2022.2116092

Access Statistics for this article

Public Management Review is currently edited by Stephen P. Osborne

More articles in Public Management Review from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().