EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Forma si procedura notariala in materia contractului de donatie

Murphy Anthony
Additional contact information
Murphy Anthony: Ovidius University of Constanta

Ars Aequi, 2017, vol. 7, issue 1, 72-79

Abstract: The present study proposes a careful analysis of the formal requirements of the donation contract in the light of the new civil provisions, as well as the correlation between these substantive substantive rules and the notarial procedure applicable in the matter. Since the acts of free provision are viewed by the legislator with reticence or even hostility, the protection granted to the disposer is reflected in the solemnity of the liberties. If only the written form (of the authentic notarial act or of the hologram) is required in the case of wills, the donation contract implies, under sanction of absolute nullity, the conclusion in authentic form. Considering this particularity of the donation, the role of the public notary in the drafting and authentication of such a contract is indissolubly linked to the imperative of the authentic form provided by the new Civil Code.

Keywords: donation contract; liberality; formal conditions; notarial procedure; solemnity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://revista.drept-ovidius.ro/index.php/arsaequi/article/view/23 (application/pdf)
https://revista.drept-ovidius.ro/index.php/arsaequi/article/view/23 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tec:aaequi:v:7:y:2017:i:1:p:72-79

Access Statistics for this article

Ars Aequi is currently edited by Mihaela Rus

More articles in Ars Aequi from Universul Juridic
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tanase Tasente ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:tec:aaequi:v:7:y:2017:i:1:p:72-79