Why Reading Teachers Are Not Trained to Use a Research-Based Pedagogy: Is Institutional Reform Possible?

Sandra Stotsky ()

Nonpartisan Education Review, 2005, vol. 1, issue 2, 1-8

Abstract: Reading instruction is one of the very few areas where it is not the case that “more research is needed.†Educational policy makers already have the theory and the evidence supporting it to guide the implementation of effective reading programs from K-12. In fact, they have had the theory and the evidence for decades. The central problem they face in providing effective reading instruction and a sound reading curriculum stems not from an absence of a research base but from willful indifference to what the research has consistently shown and to a theory that has been repeatedly confirmed. Using Jeanne Chall’s The Academic Achievement Challenge as a point of departure, I suggest why our education schools, through their influence on teachers, administrators, textbook publishers, and state and national assessments of students and teachers, have come to be the major obstacle to closing the “gap†in student achievement.

Keywords: education; policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Resources/CIMSE_talk.doc (application/msword)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:teg:journl:v:1:y:2005:i:2:p:1-8

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Nonpartisan Education Review from Nonpartisan Education Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Richard P. Phelps ().