Private Data -- The Real Story: A Huge Problem with Education Research

R. James Milgram ()

Nonpartisan Education Review, 2012, vol. 8, issue 5, 1-8

Abstract: A very influential paper on improving math outcomes was published in 2008. The authors refused to divulge their data claiming that agreements with the schools and Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act rules (FERPA) prevented it. It turns out that this is not true. The claimed legal foundations do not say what these authors said they do, this this is a widespread misconception among education researchers. When we found the identities of the schools by other means, serious problems with the conclusions of the article were quickly revealed. The 2008 paper was far from unique in this respect. There are many papers that have had enormous influences on K-12 mathematics curricula, and could not be independently verified because the authors refused to reveal their data.In this article we describe how we were able to find the real data for the 2008 paper, and point out the legal constraints that should make it very difficult for authors of such papers to withhold their data in the future.

Keywords: education; policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Essays/v8n5.pdf (application/pdf)
http://www.nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Essays/v8n5.htm (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:teg:journl:v:8:y:2012:i:5:p:1-8

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Nonpartisan Education Review from Nonpartisan Education Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Richard P. Phelps ().