 THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF STRUCTURAL REFORMSEkonomi-tek - International Economics Journal, 2016, vol. 5, issue 1, 25-69 Abstract: Do economic structural reforms have electoral consequences? This paper studies whether voters reward or punish governments for introducing structural economic reforms. Drawing on data from a sample of 122 democratic countries over the 1975-2006 period, I note—at first glance—that no significant relationship can be discerned between the probability of a government’s being voted out of office and its having put in place economic reforms in the areas of international trade, product markets, and domestic finance. However, such reforms do appear to have an impact on the outcome of subsequent elections, but to varying degrees, based on the factors of macroeconomic stability, institutional development, and a wise sequencing of proposed reforms. In other words, voters will tend to reward reformist governments if macroeconomic stability is attained, a certain threshold level of institutional quality is achieved, and an optimal sequencing of structural reforms is followed. Keywords: Elections; Structural Reforms-Trade; Current Account; Agriculture; Networks; Capital Account; Domestic Finance-Institutions (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tek:journl:v:5:y:2016:i:1:p:25-69 Access Statistics for this article Ekonomi-tek - International Economics Journal is currently edited by TEK Secretary More articles in Ekonomi-tek - International Economics Journal from Turkish Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.