Christopher Chambers and
Alan D. Miller ()
Additional contact information
Alan D. Miller: Faculty of Law and Department of Economics, University of Haifa
Theoretical Economics, 2018, vol. 13, issue 2
We investigate a normative theory of incomplete preferences in the context of preliminary screening procedures. We introduce a theory of ranking in the presence of objectively incomparable marginal contributions (apples and oranges). Our theory recommends benchmarking, a method under which an individual is deemed more accomplished than another if and only if she has achieved more benchmarks, or important accomplishments. We show that benchmark rules are characterized by four axioms: transitivity, monotonicity, incomparability of marginal gains, and incomparability of marginal losses.
Keywords: Benchmarking; axioms; measurement; apples and oranges; incompleteness; closure operator; homomorphisms (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A10 C71 D63 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:the:publsh:2506
Access Statistics for this article
Theoretical Economics is currently edited by Simon Board, Federico Echenique, Thomas Mariotti, Florian Scheuer, Ran Spiegler
More articles in Theoretical Economics from Econometric Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Martin J. Osborne ().