Iterated weak dominance and interval-dominance supermodular games
Joel Sobel ()
Additional contact information
Joel Sobel: Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego
Theoretical Economics, 2019, vol. 14, issue 1
This paper extends Milgrom and Robert's treatment of supermodular games in two ways. It points out that their main characterization result holds under a weaker assumption. It refines the arguments to provide bounds on the set of strategies that survive iterated deletion of weakly dominated strategies. I derive the bounds by iterating the best-response correspondence. I give conditions under which they are independent of the order of deletion of dominated strategies. The results have implications for equilibrium selection and dynamic stability in games.
Keywords: Supermodularity; dominance; equilibrium selection (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 D81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:the:publsh:2904
Access Statistics for this article
Theoretical Economics is currently edited by Simon Board, Federico Echenique, Thomas Mariotti, Florian Scheuer, Ran Spiegler
More articles in Theoretical Economics from Econometric Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Martin J. Osborne ().