EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Renegotiation proof mechanism design with imperfect type verification

Francisco Silva

Theoretical Economics, 2019, vol. 14, issue 3

Abstract: I consider the interaction between an agent and a principal who is unable to commit not to renegotiate. The agent's type only affects the principal's utility. The principal has access to a public signal, correlated with the agent's type, which can be used to (imperfectly) verify the agent's report. I define renegotiation proof mechanisms and characterize the optimal one. The main finding of this paper is that the optimal renegotiation proof mechanism induces pooling at the top, i.e., types above a certain threshold report to be the largest type, while types below the threshold report truthfully.

Keywords: Renegotiation proof; mechanism design; verification (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D8 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019-08-02
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://econtheory.org/ojs/index.php/te/article/viewFile/20190971/24491/715 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:the:publsh:3190

Access Statistics for this article

Theoretical Economics is currently edited by Simon Board, Todd D. Sarver, Juuso Toikka, Rakesh Vohra, Pierre-Olivier Weill

More articles in Theoretical Economics from Econometric Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Martin J. Osborne ().

 
Page updated 2024-08-10
Handle: RePEc:the:publsh:3190