Pairwise efficiency and monotonicity imply Pareto efficiency in (probabilistic) object allocation
Tom Demeulemeester () and
Bettina Klaus ()
Additional contact information
Tom Demeulemeester: Department of Economics, Maastricht University
Bettina Klaus: Department of Economics, University of Lausanne
Theoretical Economics, Forthcoming
Abstract:
We consider object allocation problems with capacities where objects have to be assigned to agents. We show that a probabilistic monotonic lottery rule satisfies ex-post Pareto efficiency if and only if it satisfies ex-post pairwise efficiency and ex-post non-wastefulness. This result allows us to strengthen various existing characterization results, both for lottery rules and for deterministic rules, by replacing (ex-post) Pareto efficiency with (ex-post) pairwise efficiency and (ex-post) non-wastefulness, e.g., for characterizations of the Random Serial Dictatorship rule (Basteck, 2025), Trading Cycles rules (Pycia and Ünver, 2017), and Hierarchical Exchange rules (Pápai, 2000).
Keywords: Object allocation problems; group strategy-proofness; Maskin monotonicity; pairwise efficiency; Pareto efficiency (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C78 D61 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-08-04
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://econtheory.org/ojs/index.php/te/article/viewForthcomingFile/6643/45800/1 Working paper version. Paper will be copyedited and typeset before publication. (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:the:publsh:6643
Access Statistics for this article
Theoretical Economics is currently edited by Federico Echenique, Mira Frick, Pablo Kurlat, Juuso Toikka, Rakesh Vohra
More articles in Theoretical Economics from Econometric Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Editor Theoretical Economics ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).