Ashamed to be selfish
David Dillenberger () and
Philipp Sadowski ()
Additional contact information
David Dillenberger: Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania
Philipp Sadowski: Department of Economics, Duke University
Theoretical Economics, 2012, vol. 7, issue 1
We study a decision maker (DM) who has preferences over choice problems, which are sets of payoff-allocations between herself and a passive recipient. An example of such a set is the collection of possible allocations in the classic dictator game. The choice of an allocation from the set is observed by the recipient, whereas the choice of the set itself is not. Behaving selfishly under observation, in the sense of not choosing the normatively best allocation, inflicts shame on DM. We derive a representation that identifies DM's private ranking of allocations, her subjective norm, and shame. The normatively best allocation can be further characterized as the Nash solution of a bargaining game induced by the second-stage choice problem.
Keywords: Shame; selfishness; subjective norm; dictator game; Nash bargaining solution (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C78 D63 D64 D80 D81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (10) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:the:publsh:674
Access Statistics for this article
Theoretical Economics is currently edited by Simon Board, Thomas Mariotti, Dilip Mookherjee, Giuseppe Moscarini, Florian Scheuer, Ran Spiegler
More articles in Theoretical Economics from Econometric Society
Series data maintained by Martin J. Osborne ().