Workaholics and Dropouts in Organizations
Wieland Müller and
Andrew Schotter ()
Journal of the European Economic Association, 2010, vol. 8, issue 4, 717-743
This paper reports the results of experiments designed to test the theory of the optimal composition of prizes in contests. In the aggregate the behavior of subjects is consistent with that predicted by the theory, but we find that such aggregate results mask an unexpected compositional effect on the individual level. Whereas theory predicts that subject efforts are continuous and increasing functions of ability, the actual efforts of our laboratory subjects bifurcate. Low-ability workers drop out and exert little or no effort, and high-ability workers try too hard. This bifurcation, which is masked by aggregation, can be explained by assuming loss aversion on the part of the subjects. (JEL: C92, D44, D72, D82, J31) (c) 2010 by the European Economic Association.
JEL-codes: C92 D44 D72 D82 J31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (58) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1542-4774/issues link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Journal Article: Workaholics and Dropouts in Organizations (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tpr:jeurec:v:8:y:2010:i:4:p:717-743
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of the European Economic Association is currently edited by Xavier Vives, George-Marios Angeletos, Orazio P. Attanasio, Fabio Canova and Roberto Perotti
More articles in Journal of the European Economic Association from MIT Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ann Olson ().