Asset Integration and Attitudes toward Risk: Theory and Evidence
Steffen Andersen,
James Cox,
Glenn Harrison,
Morten I. Lau,
E. Elisabet Rutström and
Vjollca Sadiraj
Additional contact information
Morten I. Lau: Copenhagen Business School and Durham Unversity Business School
E. Elisabet Rutström: Örebro University and Stockholm School of Economics
The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2018, vol. 100, issue 5, 816-830
Abstract:
Abstract We provide evidence that choices over small-stakes bets are consistent with assumptions of some payoff calibration paradoxes. We then exploit the existence of detailed information on individual wealth of our experimental subjects in Denmark and directly estimate risk attitudes and the degree of asset integration. We discover that behavior is consistent with partial, rather than full, asset integration. The implied risk attitudes from estimating these specifications indicate risk premiums and certainty equivalents that are a priori plausible. This theory and evidence suggest one constructive solution to payoff calibration paradoxes.
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/rest_a_00719 (application/pdf)
Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tpr:restat:v:100:y:2018:i:5:p:816-830
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://mitpressjour ... rnal/?issn=0034-6535
Access Statistics for this article
The Review of Economics and Statistics is currently edited by Pierre Azoulay, Olivier Coibion, Will Dobbie, Raymond Fisman, Benjamin R. Handel, Brian A. Jacob, Kareen Rozen, Xiaoxia Shi, Tavneet Suri and Yi Xu
More articles in The Review of Economics and Statistics from MIT Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The MIT Press ().