Measuring Global Poverty: Why PPP Methods Matter
Steve Dowrick and
Benoit Freyens ()
The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2013, vol. 95, issue 3, 813-824
We present theory and evidence to suggest that, in the context of analyzing global poverty, the EKS approach to estimating purchasing power parities yields more appropriate international comparison of real incomes than the Geary-Khamis approach. Our analysis of the 1996 and 2005 International Comparison Project data confirms that the Geary-Khamis approach substantially overstates the relative incomes of the world's poorest nations, and this leads to misleading comparisons of poverty across regions and over time. The EKS index of real income is much closer to being a true index of economic welfare and is therefore preferred for assessment of global poverty. © 2013 The President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Keywords: global; poverty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C43 I32 O57 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (30) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/REST_a_00294 link to full text PDF (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tpr:restat:v:95:y:2013:i:3:p:813-824
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://mitpressjour ... rnal/?issn=0034-6535
Access Statistics for this article
The Review of Economics and Statistics is currently edited by Pierre Azoulay, Olivier Coibion, Will Dobbie, Raymond Fisman, Benjamin R. Handel, Brian A. Jacob, Kareen Rozen, Xiaoxia Shi, Tavneet Suri and Yi Xu
More articles in The Review of Economics and Statistics from MIT Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kelly McDougall ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).