Analysis of partially observed clustered data using generalized estimating equations and multiple imputation

Kathryn M. Aloisio (), Sonja A. Swanson (), Nadia Micali (), Alison Field () and Nicholas Horton
Additional contact information
Kathryn M. Aloisio: Smith College
Sonja A. Swanson: Harvard School of Public Health
Nadia Micali: University College London
Alison Field: Harvard School of Public Health

Stata Journal, 2014, vol. 14, issue 4, 863-883

Abstract: Clustered data arise in many settings, particularly within the social and biomedical sciences. For example, multiple-source reports are commonly collected in child and adolescent psychiatric epidemiologic studies where researchers use various informants (for instance, parents and adolescents) to provide a holistic view of a subject’s symptoms. Fitzmaurice et al. (1995, American Journal of Epidemiology 142: 1194–1203) have described estimation of multiple-source models using a standard generalized estimating equation (GEE) framework. However, these studies often have missing data because additional stages of consent and assent are required. The usual GEE is unbiased when data are missing completely at random in the context of Little and Rubin (2002, Statistical Analysis with Missing Data [Wiley]). This is a strong assumption that may not be tenable. Other options, such as the weighted GEE, are computationally challenging when missingness is nonmonotone. Multiple imputation is an attractive method to fit incomplete data models while requiring only the less restrictive missing-at-random assumption. Previously, estimation of partially observed clustered data was computationally challenging. However, recent developments in Stata have facilitated using them in practice. We demonstrate how to use multiple imputation in conjunction with a GEE to investigate the prevalence of eating disorder symptoms in adolescents as reported by parents and adolescents and to determine the factors associated with concordance and prevalence. The methods are motivated by the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and their Children, a cohort study that enrolled more than 14,000 pregnant mothers in 1991–92 and has followed the health and development of their children at regular intervals. While point estimates for the missing-atrandom model were fairly similar to those for the GEE under missing completely at random, the missing-at-random model had smaller standard errors and required less stringent assumptions regarding missingness. Copyright 2014 by StataCorp LP.

Keywords: ALSPAC study; eating disorders; multiple informants; weighted estimating equations; generalized estimating equations; multiple imputation; missing data; missing at random; missing completely at random (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
Note: to access software from within Stata, net describe http://www.stata-journal.com/software/sj14-4/st0363/
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=st0363 link to article purchase

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tsj:stataj:v:14:y:2014:i:4:p:863-883

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.stata-journal.com/subscription.html

Access Statistics for this article

Stata Journal is currently edited by Nicholas J. Cox and Stephen P. Jenkins

More articles in Stata Journal from StataCorp LLC
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F. Baum () and Lisa Gilmore ().