To Buy or to Resist: When Upward Social Comparison Discourages New Product Adoption

Jaeyeon (Jae) Chung and Leonard Lee

Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2019, vol. 4, issue 3, 280 - 292

Abstract: This research examines how upward social comparison affects consumers’ propensity to adopt innovation. While one may predict that the symbolic benefits of innovation adoption may be appealing to consumers after they engage in upward social comparison, we argue that some of these consumers may, in fact, resist innovation. The degree to which these consumers adopt or resist innovation depends on whether they use a holistic or an analytical thinking style when evaluating new-product adoption. Three experiments demonstrate that following upward social comparison (vs. no social comparison), consumers who engage in holistic thinking tend to focus on the symbolic benefits of innovation adoption, resulting in greater innovation-adoption intention. By contrast, following upward social comparison (vs. no social comparison), consumers who engage in analytical thinking tend to focus on the potential risks associated with innovation adoption, resulting in greater resistance to new product adoption.

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/703697 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/703697 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/703697

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of the Association for Consumer Research from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().