Attribution to Anthropogenic Causes Helps Prevent Adverse Events
Florian Diekert,
Timo Goeschl and
Christian König-Kersting
Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 2025, vol. 12, issue 5, 1165 - 1198
Abstract:
Can attribution science, a method for quantifying—ex post—humanity’s contribution to adverse climatic events, induce pro-environmental behavioral change? We conduct a conceptual test of this question by studying, in an online experiment with 3,031 participants, whether backward-looking attribution affects future decisions, even when seemingly uninformative to a consequentialist decision-maker. By design, adverse events can arise as a result of participants’ pursuit of higher payoffs (anthropogenic cause) or as a result of chance (natural cause). Treatments vary whether adverse events are causally attributable and whether attribution can be acquired at cost. We find that ex post attributability is behaviorally relevant: attribution to an anthropogenic cause reduces future anthropogenic stress and leads to fewer adverse events compared to no attributability and compared to attribution to a natural cause. Average willingness to pay for ex post attribution is positive. The conjecture that attribution science can be behaviorally impactful and socially valuable has empirical merit.
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/734547 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/734547 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/734547
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().