Interpreting Panel Data on Job Tenure
James N Brown and
Audrey Light ()
Journal of Labor Economics, 1992, vol. 10, issue 3, 219-57
Tenure responses in the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) and the National Longitudinal Surveys are often inconsistent with calendar time. These inconsistencies pose special problems in the PSID because job changes cannot be identified directly, so researchers must infer them from error-ridden tenure data. The authors use alternative rules for partitioning PSID data into jobs and then estimate several wage and mobility models to assess the sensitivity of parameter estimates to the partitioning method. They also assess the importance of replacing "raw" tenure data with imputed measures that are internally consistent. Copyright 1992 by University of Chicago Press.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (82) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/298286 full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers. See http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JOLE for details.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlabec:v:10:y:1992:i:3:p:219-57
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Labor Economics from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().