Evidence on the Validity of Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Labor Market Data
Bound, John, et al
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: John Bound
Journal of Labor Economics, 1994, vol. 12, issue 3, 345-68
This article investigates error properties of survey reports of labor market variables. We use the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) Validation Study, a two-wave panel survey of workers employed by a large firm that shared its detailed payroll records. Individuals' reports of annual earnings are fairly accurate. Errors are negatively related to true earnings, reducing bias due to measurement error when earnings are used as an Independent variable. Biases are moderately larger for changes in earnings. Earnings per hour are less reliably reported than annual earnings. Biases in estimating earnings functions are relatively small, but those in labor supply functions may be important. Copyright 1994 by University of Chicago Press.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (134) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/298348 full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers. See http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JOLE for details.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlabec:v:12:y:1994:i:3:p:345-68
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Labor Economics from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().