Relative Efficiencies and Comparative Advantages in Job Search
Christian Belzil ()
Journal of Labor Economics, 1996, vol. 14, issue 1, 154-73
A model of employed and unemployed job search is estimated from a panel of new entrants into the labor force as well as prime-age workers. After investigating the relative efficiency of the two main search methods within a representative agent framework, the author estimates the model under a specification that encompasses comparative advantages using the quit/layoff distinction and pretransition earnings. Overall, the data indicate that unemployed search is slightly more effective for younger workers and, particularly, for those with low earnings but significantly less effective than employed search for mature workers. Copyright 1996 by University of Chicago Press.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (18) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209807 full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers. See http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JOLE for details.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlabec:v:14:y:1996:i:1:p:154-73
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Labor Economics from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().