Does Your Cohort Matter? Measuring Peer Effects in College Achievement

Scott Carrell, Richard L. Fullerton and James West

Journal of Labor Economics, 2009, vol. 27, issue 3, 439-464

Abstract: We estimate peer effects in college achievement using a data set in which individuals are exogenously assigned to peer groups of about 30 students with whom they are required to spend the majority of their time interacting. This feature enables us to estimate peer effects that are more comparable to changing the entire cohort of peers. Using this broad peer group, we measure academic peer effects of much larger magnitude than found in previous studies. The effects persist at a diminished rate into follow-on years, and we find evidence of nonlinearities in the magnitude of the effects across student academic ability. (c) 2009 by The University of Chicago.

Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (367)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/600143 link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Does Your Cohort Matter? Measuring Peer Effects in College Achievement (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlabec:v:27:y:2009:i:3:p:439-464

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Labor Economics from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().