EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Extent of Measurement Error in Longitudinal Earnings Data: Do Two Wrongs Make a Right?

John Bound and Alan Krueger ()

Journal of Labor Economics, 1991, vol. 9, issue 1, 1-24

Abstract: This article examines the properties and prevalence of measurement error in longitudinal earnings data. The analysis compares matched Current Population Survey data to administrative Social Security payroll tax records. In contrast to typically assumed properties of measurement error, the results indicate that errors are serially correlated over two years and negatively correlated with true earnings (i.e., mean reverting). In a cross section, the ratio of the variance of the signal to the total variance is 0.82 for men and 0.92 for women. These ratios fall to 0.65 and 0.81 when the data are specified in first differences. Longitudinal earnings data may be more reliable than previously believed. Copyright 1991 by University of Chicago Press.

Date: 1991
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (248) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/298256 full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers. See http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JOLE for details.

Related works:
Working Paper: The Extent of Measurement Error In Longitudinal Earnings Data: Do Two Wrongs Make A Right? (1989) Downloads
Working Paper: The Extent of Measurement Error in Longitudinal Earnings Data: Do Two Wrongs Make a Right? (1988) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlabec:v:9:y:1991:i:1:p:1-24

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Labor Economics from University of Chicago Press
Series data maintained by Journals Division ().

 
Page updated 2017-12-12
Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlabec:v:9:y:1991:i:1:p:1-24