The Persistence of the Criminal Justice Gender Gap: Evidence from 200 Years of Judicial Decisions

Anna Bindler and Randi Hjalmarsson

Journal of Law and Economics, 2020, vol. 63, issue 2, 297 - 339

Abstract: We document persistent gender gaps favoring females in jury convictions and judges’ sentences in nearly 200 years of London trials, which are unexplained by case characteristics. We find that three sharp changes in punishment severity locally affected the size and nature of the gaps but were generally not strong enough to offset their persistence. These local effects suggest a mechanism of preference-based discrimination (paternalism) in which the all-male judiciary protected females from the harshest available punishment.

Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/707482 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/707482 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
Working Paper: The Persistence of the Criminal Justice Gender Gap: Evidence from 200 Years of Judicial Decisions (2019)
Working Paper: The Persistence of the Criminal Justice Gender Gap: Evidence from 200 Years of Judicial Decisions (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/707482

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Law and Economics from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().